Bullwaves vs IC Markets: Head-to-Head Comparison
A clear, editorial comparison of safety, costs, leverage and platform conditions for traders choosing between two brokers.
At a glance
The key differences before the full technical breakdown.
Broker A
Bullwaves
Editorial score
$50
Min deposit
1:1000
Leverage
Fast-growing broker with aggressive gold pricing.
Visit Bullwaves
Broker B
IC Markets
Editorial score
$200
Min deposit
1:30 retail regulated; up to 1:500 professional/global entity
Leverage
Execution-focused broker with leverage determined by entity and client classification.
Visit IC MarketsSwipe horizontally to compare Broker A and Broker B
Technical comparison
Choosing between Bullwaves and IC Markets comes down to the conditions that matter most to your strategy. Both brokers offer access to the major markets, but their regulatory coverage, pricing model and platform mix create different trade-offs.
What separates Bullwaves and IC Markets?
Start with the regulated entity available in your jurisdiction, then compare the total cost of trading rather than the headline spread alone. Leverage can change margin requirements, but it does not reduce market risk. Platform stability, execution quality, funding options and support should also be part of the decision.
Pros and cons at a glance
Bullwaves
Large 100% deposit bonus
Competitive gold spreads
Simple onboarding
Short operating history
Single-platform focus
IC Markets
Deep liquidity and raw spreads
Broad professional platform choice
Strong execution reputation
Retail leverage capped at 1:30 under ASIC/CySEC entities
No bonus advertised
Editor's final verdict
IC Markets has the edge for most traders.
Choose Bullwaves if you want forex and indices traders who want competitive pricing, simple platform access and a large promotional margin boost. Choose IC Markets if your priority is forex traders prioritising execution and platform choice over bonuses, especially where regulated leverage limits apply..
Visit IC Markets