HankoTrade vs IC Markets: Head-to-Head Comparison
A clear, editorial comparison of safety, costs, leverage and platform conditions for traders choosing between two brokers.
At a glance
The key differences before the full technical breakdown.
Broker A
HankoTrade
Editorial score
$100
Min deposit
1:500
Leverage
Pure ECN execution with ultra-tight raw spreads.
Visit HankoTrade
Broker B
IC Markets
Editorial score
$200
Min deposit
1:30 retail regulated; up to 1:500 professional/global entity
Leverage
Execution-focused broker with leverage determined by entity and client classification.
Visit IC MarketsSwipe horizontally to compare Broker A and Broker B
Technical comparison
Choosing between HankoTrade and IC Markets comes down to the conditions that matter most to your strategy. Both brokers offer access to the major markets, but their regulatory coverage, pricing model and platform mix create different trade-offs.
What separates HankoTrade and IC Markets?
Start with the regulated entity available in your jurisdiction, then compare the total cost of trading rather than the headline spread alone. Leverage can change margin requirements, but it does not reduce market risk. Platform stability, execution quality, funding options and support should also be part of the decision.
Pros and cons at a glance
HankoTrade
Some of the tightest raw ECN spreads
Low commissions
Fast execution for scalpers
Offshore regulation only
Limited instrument range
IC Markets
Deep liquidity and raw spreads
Broad professional platform choice
Strong execution reputation
Retail leverage capped at 1:30 under ASIC/CySEC entities
No bonus advertised
Editor's final verdict
IC Markets has the edge for most traders.
Choose HankoTrade if you want scalpers and high-frequency gold traders chasing the tightest possible raw spreads. Choose IC Markets if your priority is forex traders prioritising execution and platform choice over bonuses, especially where regulated leverage limits apply..
Visit IC Markets